I attended the performance of Saturday 7th July 2012. The performance comprised a short film and three live performances. It was not immediately clear what the objective of the film was with dancers in bleak surroundings using chapel chairs as props and without music. It seemed to be a recording of their training sessions. At the end of this film there was a longish period of darkness which confused the audience. Possibly so that the stage staff could remove the video equipment. The first act was very good and the choreography a pleasure to watch. For this reason, it would have been much nicer to watch them perform under continuos bright stage lighting rather than the dim yellow affair with dry ice or whatever causing it all to be obscure. Ballet audiences are interested in seeing the dancing as e.g. do people visiting orchestral performances. A 25-30 minute intermission followed during which the stage lighting was changed. The second act - a 'Matthew Bourne' style was pleasant but the choreography was not as good as the first act but at least you could see the dancers and their efforts clearly. Famous as it is, Ravel's 'Bolero' can become a little monotonous and, given the narrative, the ballet would have been better set to English music for the period. Yet again this was followed by another 25-minute intermission and, in the light of the above, I was not prepared to wait, so left. It was noticeable that several families with youngsters were also leaving; it must have been an expensive evening for them. I would suggest that the intervals be reduced in length, especially since the dancers were only dancing one act each.